Go to top or bottom of previous codebook page
ANES 2020 Time Series
Gun Control
V202337POST: Should federal government make it more difficult or easier to buy a gun
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
51.8 |
3,825 |
1 |
More difficult |
|
6.6 |
486 |
2 |
Easier |
|
41.6 |
3,068 |
3 |
Keep these rules about the same |
|
|
18 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
3 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202338POST: How important is issue of gun access to R
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
31.9 |
2,354 |
1 |
Extremely important |
|
29.5 |
2,174 |
2 |
Very important |
|
27.7 |
2,046 |
3 |
Somewhat important |
|
8.5 |
625 |
4 |
Not too important |
|
2.5 |
183 |
5 |
Not important at all |
|
|
18 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202339POST: Favor or oppose background checks for gun purchases
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
88.2 |
6,520 |
1 |
Favor |
|
4.6 |
338 |
2 |
Oppose |
|
7.3 |
537 |
3 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
|
4 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
1 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202340POST: Favor or oppose background checks for gun purchases (STRENGTH)
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
78.1 |
5,354 |
1 |
A great deal |
|
18.6 |
1,273 |
2 |
A moderate amount |
|
3.3 |
227 |
3 |
A little |
|
|
4 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
542 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202341xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose background checks for gun puchases
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
70.0 |
5,177 |
1 |
Favor a great deal |
|
15.6 |
1,156 |
2 |
Favor a moderate amount |
|
2.5 |
184 |
3 |
Favor a little |
|
7.3 |
537 |
4 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
0.6 |
43 |
5 |
Oppose a little |
|
1.6 |
117 |
6 |
Oppose a moderate amount |
|
2.4 |
177 |
7 |
Oppose a great deal |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
9 |
-2 |
DK/RF in V202339 or V202340 |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202342POST: Favor or oppose banning 'assault-style' rifles
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
54.0 |
3,992 |
1 |
Favor |
|
27.6 |
2,042 |
2 |
Oppose |
|
18.3 |
1,355 |
3 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
|
11 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202343POST: Favor or oppose banning 'assault-style rifles' (STRENGTH)
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
76.8 |
4,634 |
1 |
A great deal |
|
18.6 |
1,121 |
2 |
A moderate amount |
|
4.6 |
275 |
3 |
A little |
|
|
3 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
1 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
1,366 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202344xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose banning 'assault-style' rifles
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
44.3 |
3,272 |
1 |
Favor a great deal |
|
8.2 |
602 |
2 |
Favor a moderate amount |
|
1.6 |
116 |
3 |
Favor a little |
|
18.3 |
1,355 |
4 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
2.2 |
159 |
5 |
Oppose a little |
|
7.0 |
519 |
6 |
Oppose a moderate amount |
|
18.4 |
1,362 |
7 |
Oppose a great deal |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
15 |
-2 |
DK/RF in V202342 or V202343 |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202345POST: Favor or oppose mandatory buy back of 'assault-style' rifles
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
45.4 |
3,353 |
1 |
Favor |
|
29.9 |
2,208 |
2 |
Oppose |
|
24.7 |
1,822 |
3 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
|
15 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
2 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202346POST: Favor or oppose mandatory buy back of 'assault-style' rifles (STRENGTH)
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
67.1 |
3,730 |
1 |
A great deal |
|
26.5 |
1,472 |
2 |
A moderate amount |
|
6.4 |
358 |
3 |
A little |
|
|
1 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
1,839 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202347xPOST: Favor/oppose mandatory buy back of 'assault-style' rifles
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
29.1 |
2,147 |
1 |
Favor a great deal |
|
13.2 |
972 |
2 |
Favor a moderate amount |
|
3.2 |
233 |
3 |
Favor a little |
|
24.7 |
1,822 |
4 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
1.7 |
125 |
5 |
Oppose a little |
|
6.8 |
500 |
6 |
Oppose a moderate amount |
|
21.4 |
1,583 |
7 |
Oppose a great deal |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
18 |
-2 |
DK/RF in V202345 or V202346 |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
Opioid Addiction
V202348POST: Should federal government do more or less about opioid drug addiction
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
69.5 |
5,095 |
1 |
Should be doing more |
|
4.9 |
357 |
2 |
Should be doing less |
|
25.7 |
1,884 |
3 |
Is doing the right amount |
|
|
56 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
8 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202349POST: Should fed govt do more or less about opioid drug addiction (STRENGTH)
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
62.7 |
3,413 |
1 |
A great deal |
|
32.0 |
1,743 |
2 |
A moderate amount |
|
5.3 |
291 |
3 |
A little |
|
|
4 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
1 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
1,948 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202350xPOST: SUMMARY Should federal govt do more/less about opioid drug addiction
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
44.8 |
3,283 |
1 |
Should be doing a great deal more |
|
21.5 |
1,573 |
2 |
Should be doing a moderate amount more |
|
3.2 |
234 |
3 |
Should be doing a little more |
|
25.7 |
1,884 |
4 |
Is doing the right amount |
|
0.8 |
57 |
5 |
Should be doing a little less |
|
2.3 |
170 |
6 |
Should be doing a moderate amount less |
|
1.8 |
130 |
7 |
Should be doing a lot less |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
53 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
69 |
-2 |
DK/RF in V202348 or V202349 |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
Go to Next Page of Codebook