Go to top or bottom of previous codebook page
ANES 2020 Time Series
Reducing the Deficit
V202321POST: Importance of reducing deficit
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
27.9 |
2,055 |
1 |
Extremely important |
|
37.6 |
2,773 |
2 |
Very important |
|
26.0 |
1,916 |
3 |
Moderately important |
|
6.2 |
456 |
4 |
A little important |
|
2.4 |
178 |
5 |
Not at all important |
|
|
22 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
2 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
51 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202322POST: WEB ONLY: DEFIMP speeding intervention - gentle prompt
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
15.9 |
147 |
1 |
Yes, go back |
|
84.1 |
775 |
2 |
No, continue |
|
|
3 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
51 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
6,477 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202323POST: WEB ONLY: DEFIMP speeding intervention - redisplay DEFIMP
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
27.2 |
40 |
1 |
Extremely important |
|
42.2 |
62 |
2 |
Very important |
|
23.8 |
35 |
3 |
Moderately important |
|
4.8 |
7 |
4 |
A little important |
|
2.0 |
3 |
5 |
Not at all important |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
51 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
7,255 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202324POST: WEB ONLY: DEFIMP speeding intervention - peremptory prompt
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
29.8 |
270 |
1 |
Extremely important |
|
32.7 |
296 |
2 |
Very important |
|
27.2 |
246 |
3 |
Moderately important |
|
7.3 |
66 |
4 |
A little important |
|
3.0 |
27 |
5 |
Not at all important |
|
|
3 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
51 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
6,494 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
Tax on Millionaires
V202325POST: Favor or oppose tax on millionaires
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
64.9 |
4,797 |
1 |
Favor |
|
16.2 |
1,197 |
2 |
Oppose |
|
18.9 |
1,394 |
3 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
|
13 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
1 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
51 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
Approve or Disapprove of Affordable Care Act
V202326POST: Approve or disapprove of the Affordable Care Act
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
49.3 |
3,642 |
1 |
Approve |
|
31.3 |
2,313 |
2 |
Disapprove |
|
19.4 |
1,437 |
3 |
Neither approve nor disapprove |
|
|
6 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
4 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
51 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202327POST: Approve or disapprove of the Affordable Care Act (STRENGTH)
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
64.4 |
3,832 |
1 |
A great deal |
|
30.1 |
1,788 |
2 |
A moderate amount |
|
5.5 |
329 |
3 |
A little |
|
|
6 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
51 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
1,447 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202328xPOST: SUMMARY: Approve/disapprove Affordable Care Act
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
32.1 |
2,372 |
1 |
Approve a great deal |
|
14.5 |
1,069 |
2 |
Approve a moderate amount |
|
2.7 |
196 |
3 |
Approve a little |
|
19.5 |
1,437 |
4 |
Neither approve nor disapprove |
|
1.8 |
133 |
5 |
Disapprove a little |
|
9.7 |
719 |
6 |
Disapprove a moderate amount |
|
19.8 |
1,460 |
7 |
Disapprove a great deal |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
51 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
16 |
-2 |
DK/RF in V202326 or V202327 |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
Approve or Disapprove of Vaccines in Schools
V202329POST: Favor or oppose requiring vaccines in schools
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
74.5 |
5,508 |
1 |
Favor |
|
10.0 |
737 |
2 |
Oppose |
|
15.5 |
1,145 |
3 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
|
9 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
2 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
52 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202330POST: Favor or oppose requiring vaccines in schools (STRENGTH)
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
73.1 |
4,563 |
1 |
A great deal |
|
22.4 |
1,399 |
2 |
A moderate amount |
|
4.5 |
281 |
3 |
A little |
|
|
2 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
52 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
1,156 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202331xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose requiring vaccines in schools
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
56.3 |
4,163 |
1 |
Favor a great deal |
|
15.8 |
1,169 |
2 |
Favor a moderate amount |
|
2.4 |
174 |
3 |
Favor a little |
|
15.5 |
1,145 |
4 |
Neiter favor nor oppose |
|
1.4 |
107 |
5 |
Oppose a little |
|
3.1 |
230 |
6 |
Oppose a moderate amount |
|
5.4 |
400 |
7 |
Oppose a great deal |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
52 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
13 |
-2 |
DK/RF in V202329 or V202330 |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
Climate Change
V202332POST: How much is climate change affecting severe weather/temperatures in US
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
9.4 |
693 |
1 |
Not at all |
|
15.2 |
1,125 |
2 |
A little |
|
20.9 |
1,542 |
3 |
A moderate amount |
|
17.8 |
1,314 |
4 |
A lot |
|
36.7 |
2,711 |
5 |
A great deal |
|
|
12 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
4 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
52 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202333POST: How important is issue of climate change to R
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
12.8 |
944 |
1 |
Not at all important |
|
15.3 |
1,133 |
2 |
A little important |
|
23.2 |
1,716 |
3 |
Moderately important |
|
22.3 |
1,647 |
4 |
Very important |
|
26.4 |
1,947 |
5 |
Extremely important |
|
|
14 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
52 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202334POST: Favor or oppose increased regulation on greenhouse emissions
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
61.6 |
4,538 |
1 |
Favor |
|
13.7 |
1,012 |
2 |
Oppose |
|
24.7 |
1,822 |
3 |
Neither favor nor oppose |
|
|
24 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
5 |
-8 |
Don't know |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
52 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202335POST: Favor or oppose increased regulation on greenhouse emissions (STRENGTH)
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
58.6 |
3,250 |
1 |
A great deal |
|
34.0 |
1,886 |
2 |
A moderate amount |
|
7.4 |
410 |
3 |
A little |
|
|
4 |
-9 |
Refused |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
52 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
1,851 |
-1 |
Inapplicable |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
V202336xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose increased regulation on greenhouse emissions
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
37.5 |
2,762 |
1 |
Favor a great deal |
|
19.9 |
1,465 |
2 |
Favor a moderate amount |
|
4.2 |
307 |
3 |
Favor a little |
|
24.7 |
1,822 |
4 |
Neiter favor nor oppose |
|
1.4 |
103 |
5 |
Oppose a little |
|
5.7 |
421 |
6 |
Oppose a moderate amount |
|
6.6 |
488 |
7 |
Oppose a great deal |
|
|
77 |
-7 |
No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview |
|
|
750 |
-6 |
No post-election interview |
|
|
52 |
-5 |
Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW) |
|
|
33 |
-2 |
DK/RF in V202334 or V202335 |
|
100.0 |
8,280 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Minimum code defined as valid: |
0 |
Go to Next Page of Codebook