Go to top or bottom of previous codebook page

ANES 2020 Time Series


Diversity in the US

V202371POST: Does increasing diversity made US better or worse place to live
Percent N Value Label
54.4 4,008 1 Better
7.2 533 2 Worse
38.3 2,820 3 Makes no difference


34 -9 Refused


4 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202372POST: Does increasing diversity made US better or worse place to live (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
68.3 3,095 1 A lot
31.7 1,438 2 A little


7 -9 Refused


1 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


2,858 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202373xPOST: SUMMARY: Increasing diversity made US better/worse place to live
Percent N Value Label
38.5 2,833 1 A lot better
15.9 1,168 2 A little better
38.4 2,820 3 Makes no difference
3.7 270 4 A little worse
3.6 262 5 A lot worse


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


46 -2 DK/RF in V202371 or V202372

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Giving All Citizens $12,000 per year

V202374POST: Favor or oppose federal program giving all citizens $12K/year
Percent N Value Label
25.4 1,871 1 Favor
48.2 3,545 2 Oppose
26.4 1,943 3 Neither favor nor oppose


29 -9 Refused


11 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202375POST: Favor or oppose federal program giving all citizens $12K/year (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
62.0 3,356 1 A great deal
28.7 1,556 2 A moderate amount
9.3 502 3 A little


2 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


1,983 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202376xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose federal program giving citizens $12K/year
Percent N Value Label
11.3 833 1 Favor a great deal
10.2 750 2 Favor a moderate amount
3.9 288 3 Favor a little
26.4 1,943 4 Neither favor nor oppose
2.9 214 5 Oppose a little
11.0 806 6 Oppose a moderate amount
34.3 2,523 7 Oppose a great deal


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


42 -2 DK/RF in V202374 or V202375

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Increasing the Minimum Wage

V202377POST: Should the minimum wage be raised, kept the same, or lowered
Percent N Value Label
60.9 4,478 1 Raised
31.0 2,283 2 Kept the same
2.3 172 3 Lowered
5.8 424 4 Eliminated


39 -9 Refused


3 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Govt More or Less to Help Pay for Health Care

V202378POST: Increase/decrease government spending to help people pay for health care
Percent N Value Label
54.7 4,013 1 Increase
12.5 916 2 Decrease
32.8 2,408 3 No change


53 -9 Refused


9 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202379POST: How much increase/decrease in goverment help paying for health care
Percent N Value Label
36.8 1,808 1 A great deal
49.2 2,418 2 A moderate amount
14.1 692 3 A little


9 -9 Refused


2 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


2,470 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202380xPOST: SUMMARY: Increase/decrease government spending to help pay for health care
Percent N Value Label
19.9 1,457 1 Increase a great deal
27.5 2,018 2 Increase a moderate amount
7.2 530 3 Increase a little
32.9 2,408 4 No change
2.2 162 5 Decrease a little
5.5 400 6 Decrease a moderate amount
4.8 351 7 Decrease a great deal


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


73 -2 DK/RF in V202378 or V202379

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Health Benefits of Vaccines

V202381POST: Do health benefits of vaccinations outweight the risks
Percent N Value Label
76.3 5,608 1 Benefits outweigh risks
9.0 661 2 Risks outweigh benefits
14.7 1,078 3 No difference


47 -9 Refused


5 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202382POST: Do health benefits of vaccinations outweight the risks (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
66.1 4,135 1 Much greater
25.2 1,575 2 Moderately greater
8.8 548 3 Slightly greater


11 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


1,130 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202383xPOST: SUMMARY: Health benefits of vaccinations outweigh risks
Percent N Value Label
53.5 3,924 1 Health benefits much greater than risks
17.6 1,290 2 Health benefits moderately greater than risks
5.3 386 3 Health benefits slightly greater than risks
14.7 1,078 4 No difference
2.2 162 5 Risks slightly greather than health benefits
3.9 285 6 Risks moderately greater than health benefits
2.9 211 7 Risks much greater than health benefits


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


63 -2 DK/RF in V202381 or V202382

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Sexual Harrassment

V202384POST: Attention to sexual harrassment has gone too far or not far enough
Percent N Value Label
21.9 1,605 1 Has gone too far
35.5 2,605 2 Has not gone far enough
42.6 3,126 3 Has been about right


56 -9 Refused


7 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202385POST: Attention to sexual harrassment has gone too far (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
54.3 871 1 Much too far
45.7 732 2 A little too far


1 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


55 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


5,794 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202386POST: Attention to sexual harrassment has not gone far enough (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
53.4 1,387 1 Not nearly far enough
46.6 1,208 2 Not quite far enough


10 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


55 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


4,793 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202387xPOST: SUMMARY: Attention to sexual harrassment as gone too far/not far enough
Percent N Value Label
11.9 872 1 Has gone much too far
10.0 732 2 Has gone a little too far
42.7 3,126 3 Has been about right
16.5 1,208 4 Has not gone quite far enough
18.9 1,387 5 Has not gone nearly far enough


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


54 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


74 -2 DK/RF in V202384, V202385, or V202386

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
Go to Next Page of Codebook