Go to top or bottom of previous codebook page

ANES 2020 Time Series


Preferences in Hiring/Promotion for Blacks

V202249POST: For or against preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
Percent N Value Label
31.4 2,273 1 For preferential hiring and promotion of blacks
68.6 4,974 2 Against preferential hiring and promotion of blacks


161 -9 Refused


16 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202250POST: Favor preferential hiring/promotion of blacks strongly or not strongly
Percent N Value Label
58.7 1,335 1 Strongly
41.3 938 2 Not strongly


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


5,151 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202251POST: Oppose preferential hiring/promotion blacks strongly or not strongly
Percent N Value Label
64.8 3,220 1 Strongly
35.2 1,747 2 Not strongly


7 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


2,450 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202252xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
Percent N Value Label
18.4 1,335 1 Strongly for preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
13.0 938 2 Not strongly for preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
24.1 1,747 3 Not strongly against preferential hiring/promotion of blacks
44.5 3,220 4 Strongly against preferential hiring/promotion of blacks


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


184 -2 DK/RF V202249, V202250, or V202251

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Government Doing More or Less and Regulation

V202253POST: Less government better OR more that government should be doing
Percent N Value Label
41.5 3,055 1 The less government the better
58.5 4,303 2 More things government should be doing


61 -9 Refused


5 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202254POST: Less government better OR more that government should be doing (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
46.9 3,448 1 Very strongly
44.8 3,292 2 Somewhat strongly
8.3 612 3 Not strongly


6 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


66 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202255xPOST:SUMMARY: Less or more government
Percent N Value Label
22.4 1,645 1 Feels strongly less government better
15.7 1,157 2 Feels somewhat strongly less government better
3.4 250 3 Feels not strongly less government better
4.9 362 4 Feels not strongly more things government should be doing
29.0 2,135 5 Feels somewhat stongly more things government should be doing
24.5 1,803 6 Feels strongly more things government should be doing


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


72 -2 DK/RF V202253 or V202254

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202256POST: Would it be good for society to have more or less government regulation
Percent N Value Label
4.6 341 1 Much more
12.0 884 2 Somewhat more
14.6 1,078 3 A little more
28.7 2,119 4 About the same amount
15.3 1,126 5 A little less
11.5 851 6 Somewhat less
13.3 980 7 Much less


42 -9 Refused


3 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Income Inequality

V202257POST: Favor or oppose government trying to reduce income inequality
Percent N Value Label
45.5 3,359 1 Favor
29.2 2,155 2 Oppose
25.4 1,876 3 Neither favor nor oppose


28 -9 Refused


6 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202258POST: Favor or oppose government trying to reduce income inequality (STRENGTH)
Percent N Value Label
59.3 3,271 1 A great deal
33.9 1,871 2 A moderate amount
6.7 370 3 A little


2 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


1,910 -1 Inapplicable

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202259xPOST: SUMMARY: Favor/oppose government trying to reduce income inequality
Percent N Value Label
26.1 1,930 1 Favor a great deal
16.2 1,200 2 Favor a moderate amount
3.1 228 3 Favor a little
25.4 1,876 4 Neither favor nor oppose
1.9 142 5 Oppose a little
9.1 671 6 Oppose a moderate amount
18.2 1,341 7 Oppose a great deal


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


29 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)


36 -2 DK/RF in 202257 or V202258

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0

Beliefs About Equality or Inequality

V202260POST: Society should make sure everyone has equal opportunity
Percent N Value Label
53.0 3,931 1 Agree strongly
26.7 1,982 2 Agree somewhat
10.1 749 3 Neither agree nor disagree
6.3 466 4 Disagree somewhat
3.8 282 5 Disagree strongly


11 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


32 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202261POST: We'd be better off if worried less about equality
Percent N Value Label
11.4 841 1 Agree strongly
19.0 1,405 2 Agree somewhat
17.8 1,318 3 Neither agree nor disagree
19.4 1,431 4 Disagree somewhat
32.5 2,400 5 Disagree strongly


24 -9 Refused


2 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


32 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202262POST: Not a big problem if some have more chance in life
Percent N Value Label
4.4 323 1 Agree strongly
13.1 969 2 Agree somewhat
23.5 1,737 3 Neither agree nor disagree
25.7 1,906 4 Disagree somewhat
33.3 2,468 5 Disagree strongly


18 -9 Refused


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


32 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
V202263POST: If people were treated more fairly we would have fewer problems
Percent N Value Label
35.4 2,620 1 Agree strongly
32.0 2,368 2 Agree somewhat
16.2 1,202 3 Neither agree nor disagree
10.4 771 4 Disagree somewhat
6.0 442 5 Disagree strongly


15 -9 Refused


2 -8 Don't know


77 -7 No post-election data, deleted due to incomplete interview


750 -6 No post-election interview


33 -5 Interview breakoff (sufficient partial IW)

100.0 8,280
Total
Properties
Data type: numeric
Minimum code defined as valid: 0
Go to Next Page of Codebook