Go to top or bottom of previous codebook page
IGS Poll: 2019_02
DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES AND PROPOSALS
Q11a11. a. If the California Democratic primary for president were being held today and the ballot listed these candidates, who would be your first choice?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
0.4 |
8 |
1 |
Kirsten Gillibrand |
|
19.9 |
454 |
2 |
Elizabeth Warren |
|
2.8 |
64 |
3 |
Beto O’Rourke |
|
1.2 |
27 |
4 |
Cory Booker |
|
0.7 |
15 |
5 |
Amy Klobucher |
|
0.4 |
9 |
6 |
Julian Castro |
|
16.7 |
380 |
7 |
Bernie Sanders |
|
0.3 |
7 |
8 |
John Hickenlooper |
|
1.3 |
29 |
9 |
Andrew Yang |
|
9.3 |
212 |
10 |
Pete Buttigieg |
|
14.4 |
329 |
11 |
Kamala Harris |
|
0.4 |
8 |
12 |
Jay Inslee |
|
19.5 |
444 |
13 |
Joe Biden |
|
0.1 |
2 |
14 |
Tim Ryan |
|
0.4 |
8 |
15 |
Eric Swalwell |
|
0.3 |
7 |
16 |
Marianne Williamson |
|
0.1 |
2 |
17 |
Steve Bullock |
|
0.0 |
0 |
18 |
John Delaney |
|
12.1 |
277 |
19 |
Don’t know/undecided/none |
|
|
2,153 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/89-91
|
Q11b11. b. Who would be your second choice?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
1.2 |
25 |
1 |
Kirsten Gillibrand |
|
19.5 |
391 |
2 |
Elizabeth Warren |
|
5.2 |
105 |
3 |
Beto O’Rourke |
|
3.3 |
66 |
4 |
Cory Booker |
|
1.7 |
35 |
5 |
Amy Klobucher |
|
0.6 |
13 |
6 |
Julian Castro |
|
13.5 |
270 |
7 |
Bernie Sanders |
|
0.4 |
8 |
8 |
John Hickenlooper |
|
1.0 |
21 |
9 |
Andrew Yang |
|
10.6 |
212 |
10 |
Pete Buttigieg |
|
21.8 |
438 |
11 |
Kamala Harris |
|
0.9 |
18 |
12 |
Jay Inslee |
|
12.8 |
257 |
13 |
Joe Biden |
|
0.1 |
2 |
14 |
Tim Ryan |
|
0.6 |
12 |
15 |
Eric Swalwell |
|
0.2 |
5 |
16 |
Marianne Williamson |
|
0.1 |
3 |
17 |
Steve Bullock |
|
0.2 |
4 |
18 |
John Delaney |
|
6.0 |
120 |
19 |
Don’t know/undecided/none |
|
|
2,430 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/92-94
|
Q11c11. c. Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
Total Cases:
4,435
| Properties |
| Data type: |
character |
| Record/columns: |
1/95-141
|
Q11c_111c. 1. Kirsten Gillibrand: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
92.4 |
2,098 |
0 |
No |
|
7.6 |
173 |
1 |
Kirsten Gillibrand |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/142-144
|
Q11c_211c. 2. Elizabeth Warren: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
92.9 |
2,109 |
0 |
No |
|
7.1 |
162 |
1 |
Elizabeth Warren |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/145-147
|
Q11c_311c. 3. Beto O’Rourke: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
91.5 |
2,079 |
0 |
No |
|
8.5 |
192 |
1 |
Beto O’Rourke |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/148-150
|
Q11c_411c. 4. Cory Booker: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
94.0 |
2,135 |
0 |
No |
|
6.0 |
136 |
1 |
Cory Booker |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/151-153
|
Q11c_511c. 5. Amy Klobucher: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
93.7 |
2,129 |
0 |
No |
|
6.3 |
142 |
1 |
Amy Klobucher |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/154-156
|
Q11c_611c. 6. Julian Castro: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
95.2 |
2,161 |
0 |
No |
|
4.8 |
110 |
1 |
Julian Castro |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/157-159
|
Q11c_711c. 7. Bernie Sanders: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
82.6 |
1,876 |
0 |
No |
|
17.4 |
395 |
1 |
Bernie Sanders |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/160-162
|
Q11c_811c. 8. John Hickenlooper: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
92.0 |
2,089 |
0 |
No |
|
8.0 |
182 |
1 |
John Hickenlooper |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/163-165
|
Q11c_911c. 9. Andrew Yang: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
91.3 |
2,074 |
0 |
No |
|
8.7 |
197 |
1 |
Andrew Yang |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/166-168
|
Q11c_1011c. 10. Pete Buttigieg: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
94.8 |
2,152 |
0 |
No |
|
5.2 |
119 |
1 |
Pete Buttigieg |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/169-171
|
Q11c_1111c. 11. Kamala Harris: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
92.6 |
2,102 |
0 |
No |
|
7.4 |
169 |
1 |
Kamala Harris |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/172-174
|
Q11c_1211c. 12. Jay Inslee: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
94.6 |
2,149 |
0 |
No |
|
5.4 |
122 |
1 |
Jay Inslee |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/175-177
|
Q11c_1311c. 13. Joe Biden: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
81.1 |
1,842 |
0 |
No |
|
18.9 |
429 |
1 |
Joe Biden |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/178-180
|
Q11c_1411c. 14. Tim Ryan: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
93.1 |
2,114 |
0 |
No |
|
6.9 |
157 |
1 |
Tim Ryan |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/181-183
|
Q11c_1511c. 15. Eric Swalwell: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
94.0 |
2,134 |
0 |
No |
|
6.0 |
137 |
1 |
Eric Swalwell |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/184-186
|
Q11c_1611c. 16. Marianne Williamson: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
89.6 |
2,034 |
0 |
No |
|
10.4 |
237 |
1 |
Marianne Williamson |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/187-189
|
Q11c_1711c. 17. Steve Bullock: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
92.9 |
2,110 |
0 |
No |
|
7.1 |
161 |
1 |
Steve Bullock |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/190-192
|
Q11c_1811c. 18. John Delaney: Which, if any, of these candidates would be unacceptable to you as the Democratic nominee?
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
91.2 |
2,072 |
0 |
No |
|
8.8 |
199 |
1 |
John Delaney |
|
|
2,164 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/193-195
|
Q12a12. a. Advantage for candidate - Is a woman.
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
28.9 |
652 |
1 |
Major advantage |
|
42.2 |
952 |
2 |
Minor advantage |
|
24.2 |
546 |
3 |
Minor disadvantage |
|
4.7 |
106 |
4 |
Major disadvantage |
|
|
2,179 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/196-198
|
Q12b12. b. Advantage for candidate - Is a person of color.
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
18.8 |
421 |
1 |
Major advantage |
|
51.0 |
1,143 |
2 |
Minor advantage |
|
27.1 |
608 |
3 |
Minor disadvantage |
|
3.2 |
71 |
4 |
Major disadvantage |
|
|
2,192 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/199-201
|
Q12c12. c. Advantage for candidate - Is over the age of 70.
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
2.2 |
49 |
1 |
Major advantage |
|
10.4 |
237 |
2 |
Minor advantage |
|
62.4 |
1,415 |
3 |
Minor disadvantage |
|
25.0 |
568 |
4 |
Major disadvantage |
|
|
2,166 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/202-204
|
Q12d12. d. Advantage for candidate - Is a political outsider.
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
6.2 |
139 |
1 |
Major advantage |
|
31.4 |
708 |
2 |
Minor advantage |
|
43.5 |
981 |
3 |
Minor disadvantage |
|
19.0 |
429 |
4 |
Major disadvantage |
|
|
2,178 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/205-207
|
Q12e12. e. Advantage for candidate - Has decades of political experience.
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
44.3 |
1,008 |
1 |
Major advantage |
|
46.2 |
1,051 |
2 |
Minor advantage |
|
7.8 |
178 |
3 |
Minor disadvantage |
|
1.6 |
36 |
4 |
Major disadvantage |
|
|
2,162 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/208-210
|
Q12f12. f. Advantage for candidate - Is under the age of 50.
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
19.8 |
445 |
1 |
Major advantage |
|
56.5 |
1,272 |
2 |
Minor advantage |
|
22.4 |
503 |
3 |
Minor disadvantage |
|
1.3 |
30 |
4 |
Major disadvantage |
|
|
2,185 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/211-213
|
Q12g12. g. Advantage for candidate - Is a gay man.
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
7.8 |
175 |
1 |
Major advantage |
|
41.1 |
917 |
2 |
Minor advantage |
|
39.1 |
874 |
3 |
Minor disadvantage |
|
12.0 |
267 |
4 |
Major disadvantage |
|
|
2,202 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/214-216
|
Q13a13. a. Policy adoption - Medicare for all, shifting to a government-run health care system
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
49.0 |
1,117 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
42.2 |
963 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
8.8 |
201 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,154 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/217-219
|
Q13b13. b. Policy adoption - Offering free tuition to all qualified students to attend a public four-year college
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
42.4 |
970 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
45.8 |
1,048 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
11.8 |
269 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,148 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/220-222
|
Q13c13. c. Policy adoption - Increasing taxes on the wealthy
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
71.7 |
1,636 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
23.5 |
537 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
4.8 |
109 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,153 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/223-225
|
Q13d13. d. Policy adoption - The Green New Deal, making sweeping changes in government policies to transition the U.S. to renewable and zero-emission energy sources in transportation, manufacturing, building and farming policies
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
63.2 |
1,443 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
33.8 |
772 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
3.0 |
69 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,151 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/226-228
|
Q13e13. e. Policy adoption - Legalizing recreational marijuana nationwide
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
41.7 |
952 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
43.0 |
982 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
15.2 |
348 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,153 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/229-231
|
Q13f13. f. Policy adoption - Reforming the nation’s immigration laws so that undocumented immigrants who have lived in the U.S. for a number of years can stay and apply for citizenship
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
65.6 |
1,497 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
31.0 |
707 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
3.5 |
79 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,152 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/232-234
|
Q13g13. g. Policy adoption - Increasing the pay of K-12 teachers nationwide
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
73.0 |
1,666 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
24.9 |
568 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
2.1 |
48 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,153 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/235-237
|
Q13h13. h. Policy adoption - Reducing the length of federal prison sentences for low- level federal offenses
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
51.7 |
1,179 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
41.8 |
954 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
6.5 |
149 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,153 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/238-240
|
Q13i13. i. Policy adoption - Passing new laws to expand background checks to cover all sales of firearms
|
Percent |
N |
Value |
Label |
|
89.1 |
2,036 |
1 |
Move immediately to adopt |
|
9.1 |
207 |
2 |
Take steps in this direction |
|
1.9 |
43 |
3 |
Should not adopt this policy |
|
|
2,149 |
. |
(No Data) |
|
100.0 |
4,435 |
|
Total |
| Properties |
| Data type: |
numeric |
| Record/columns: |
1/241-243
|
Go to Next Page of Codebook